<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Raidious &#187; earned media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://raidious.com/tag/earned-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://raidious.com</link>
	<description>Shine Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 22:10:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Owned Media: If You Can&#8217;t Say Something Nice, Issue a Press Release</title>
		<link>http://raidious.com/owned-media-if-you-can%e2%80%99t-say-something-nice-issue-a-press-release/</link>
		<comments>http://raidious.com/owned-media-if-you-can%e2%80%99t-say-something-nice-issue-a-press-release/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 17:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Chandler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Owned Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Burson-Marsteller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earned media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gmail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Owned media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paid media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PublicRelations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raidious.com/?p=3867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Engaging a PR firm to propagate negative sentiment via earned media opposes the inherent transparency of owned media.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="post_image_link" href="http://raidious.com/owned-media-if-you-can%e2%80%99t-say-something-nice-issue-a-press-release/" title="Permanent link to Owned Media: If You Can&#8217;t Say Something Nice, Issue a Press Release"><img class="post_image alignright" src="http://raidious.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/low-blow.png" width="300" height="200" alt="Image courtesy Flickr" /></a>
</p><p>Just like everyone&#8217;s mother always said, if you can&#8217;t say something nice, don&#8217;t say anything at all. Or as my grandmother used to say, &#8220;Keep mouthing off like that and a bigger boy&#8217;s going to pop you one.&#8221;</p>
<p>The <a title="owned media" href="http://raidious.com/tag/owned-media/">owned media</a> vs. earned and paid media debate is apparently not immune from the same wisdom passed along by our elders: <a class="zem_slink" title="Google" href="http://google.com" rel="homepage">Google</a> has officially popped <a class="zem_slink" title="Facebook" href="http://facebook.com" rel="homepage">Facebook</a> right in the kisser for saying, well, not-so-nice things.</p>
<p>As has been <a title="CNet" href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13506_3-20062192-17.html?part=rss&amp;subj=news&amp;tag=2547-1_3-0-20" target="_blank">widely</a> <a title="Mashable" href="http://mashable.com/2011/05/12/facebook-smear-campaign-google/" target="_blank">reported</a> <a title="TechCrunch" href="http://techcrunch.com/2011/05/12/facebook-loses-much-face-in-secret-smear-on-google/" target="_blank">all over</a> <a title="GigaOM" href="http://gigaom.com/2011/05/12/facebook-smear-campaign-takes-war-against-google-to-defcon-2/" target="_blank">the web</a>, Facebook was caught red-handed engaging in a smear campaign against Google via public relations company <a class="zem_slink" title="Burson-Marsteller" href="http://www.burson-marsteller.com/" rel="homepage">Burson-Marsteller</a>. After Facebook came clean on Wednesday, the PR firm admitted they had pitched stories to bloggers and other media with statements like &#8220;The American people must be made aware of the now immediate intrusions into their deeply personal lives Google is cataloging and broadcasting every minute of every day&#8211;without their permission.&#8221;</p>
<p>The source of Facebook&#8217;s ire is Google&#8217;s Social Circle, which permits users of Google Chat and Contacts to see public information about each other&#8211;including Facebook information, <a class="zem_slink" title="Twitter" href="http://twitter.com" rel="homepage">Twitter</a> feeds, and personal websites.</p>
<p>To be fair, Google&#8217;s profiling isn&#8217;t exactly opt-in. Whether or not users have a <a class="zem_slink" title="Gmail" href="http://gmail.com" rel="homepage">Gmail</a> or other Google service account, they must sign up for Google Profiles in order to customize and decide exactly what information is available to others.</p>
<p>But compare this to Facebook&#8217;s labyrinthine privacy and security settings, and the frequent complaints about user privacy issues and information sharing, and it seems like the pot calling the kettle black.</p>
<p>Facebook has since stated that it did not intend to engage in a &#8220;smear campagin,&#8221; but was merely trying to ensure the public was well informed. I don&#8217;t recall a public service announcement from Facebook &#8220;informing&#8221; people that they disclose user information to advertisers and other third parties.</p>
<p>Regardless of intent, in my mind it all comes down to the inherent transparency of owned media. Engaging a PR firm to propagate negative sentiment via <a class="zem_slink" title="Earned media" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earned_media" rel="wikipedia">earned media</a> about another company, all the while asking that your company&#8217;s name be withheld, is a smear campaign whether you admit it or not.</p>
<p>Compare that tactic to using owned media channels to go beyond marketing your services to calling into question the business practices of a competitor. How far would you go, knowing that your official platforms were the source of potentially injurious (or worse, libelous) statements? Would you be more or less inclined to bite your tongue?</p>
<p>Not that any of this will ultimately matter to either company: users are more and more free with their personal information on the web, and to most people this is a non-story about two corporate behemoths pointing fingers at each other in the usual game of &#8220;Oh yeah? Well guess what <em>they</em> did!&#8221;</p>
<p>Despite the myriad complaints about privacy, Facebook isn&#8217;t losing users in droves, and people still depend on Google&#8217;s various services like they were oxygen.</p>
<p>White this is far from the first or last such incident, it is nonetheless embarrassing for any company to be outed for throwing such an obvious and ultimately useless low blow. If you&#8217;ve got something to say about a competitor and don&#8217;t have the sand to be completely transparent via owned media, do everyone a favor and heed mom&#8217;s advice.</p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Enhanced by Zemanta" href="http://www.zemanta.com/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/zemified_e.png?x-id=299835d7-f59b-495e-839d-1527f4826122" alt="Enhanced by Zemanta" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://raidious.com/owned-media-if-you-can%e2%80%99t-say-something-nice-issue-a-press-release/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Owned Media update: Official Research from Forrester</title>
		<link>http://raidious.com/owned-media-update-official-research-from-forrester/</link>
		<comments>http://raidious.com/owned-media-update-official-research-from-forrester/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 18:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Taulbee Jackson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Content Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earned media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forrester Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing and Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Owned media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paid media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PR firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public relations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.raidious.com/?p=1035</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back in September, I wrote this post regarding the definitions of Paid Media (what Ad Agencies do), Earned Media(what PR firms do) and Owned Media (what Raidious does).

Recently found this article from Forrester Research, apparently they've been looking into this. Good information!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Back in September, I wrote <a title="owned media paid media earned media" href="http://blog.raidious.com/earned-media-vs-paid-media-vs-owned-media/" target="_self">this post</a> regarding the definitions of <a id="aptureLink_fVegC3kW1Z" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advertising">Paid Media</a> (what Ad Agencies do), <a id="aptureLink_5yRfXnRgh9" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earned%20media">Earned Media</a>(what PR firms do) and <a id="aptureLink_3dRlzycE7s" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sIFYPQjYhv8">Owned Media</a> (what Raidious does).</p>
<p>Recently found <a title="Forrester on Owned Media" href="http://blogs.forrester.com/marketing/2009/12/defining-earned-owned-and-paid-media.html" target="_blank">this article</a> from <a id="aptureLink_haZ3FeUpSW" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forrester%20Research">Forrester Research</a>, apparently they&#8217;ve been looking into this. Good information!</p>
<div id="attachment_1037" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 600px">
	<a href="http://blog.raidious.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/OwnedMedia.gif"><img class="size-full wp-image-1037" title="OwnedMedia" src="http://blog.raidious.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/OwnedMedia.gif" alt="Owned Media vs Paid Media vs Earned Media" width="600" height="327" /></a>
	<p class="wp-caption-text">Raidious is purpose built to manage owned media properties for large brands. </p>
</div>
<p><strong>Related articles by Zemanta</strong></p>
<ul class="zemanta-article-ul">
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.socialmediatoday.com/SMC/162110">The 2010 Social Media Marketing Ecosystem</a> (socialmediatoday.com)</li>
</ul>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/276ac88e-9ab9-4862-ba95-56a95e61638d/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=276ac88e-9ab9-4862-ba95-56a95e61638d" alt="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" /></a><span class="zem-script more-related pretty-attribution"><script src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" type="text/javascript"></script></span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://raidious.com/owned-media-update-official-research-from-forrester/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Earned Media vs. Paid Media vs. Owned Media</title>
		<link>http://raidious.com/earned-media-vs-paid-media-vs-owned-media/</link>
		<comments>http://raidious.com/earned-media-vs-paid-media-vs-owned-media/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Taulbee Jackson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Content Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Email Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earned media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing and Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Owned media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paid media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video clip]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.raidious.com/earned-media-vs-paid-media-vs-owned-media/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the past, there were basically two approaches to marketing services: earned media (PR) and paid media (advertising). More recently we've seen the rise of owned media.

What's the difference? It's mostly about Control.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>In the past, there were basically two approaches to <a class="zem_slink" title="Marketing" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marketing">marketing</a> services: earned media (PR) and paid media (<a class="zem_slink" title="Advertising" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advertising">advertising</a>). More recently we&#8217;ve seen the rise of owned media.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s the difference? It&#8217;s mostly about Control.</p>
<p><span id="more-674"></span></p>
<p>Earned media: Getting someone else to provide content about you on a media platform they own and control. Also known as <a class="zem_slink" title="Public relations" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_relations">Public Relations</a>.</p>
<p>Paid Media: Paying someone to include your message alongside their content, on media they own and control. Also known as Advertising.</p>
<p>Owned Media: Providing your own content on media platforms you own and control.</p>
<p>Raidious deals only with owned media &#8211; we help you provide the content for the media platforms you own and control &#8211; email, <a class="zem_slink" title="Blog" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blog">blogs</a>, social media, <a class="zem_slink" title="Video clip" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Video_clip">web video</a>, <a class="zem_slink" title="Mobile device" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobile_device">mobile devices</a>, and more.</p>
<blockquote><p>UPDATE: Recently found <a title="Forrester on Owned Media" href="http://blogs.forrester.com/marketing/2009/12/defining-earned-owned-and-paid-media.html" target="_blank">this article</a> from <a id="aptureLink_haZ3FeUpSW" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forrester%20Research">Forrester Research</a>, apparently they&#8217;ve been looking into this. Good information.</p></blockquote>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/2e8f3e6c-3e24-448f-a06f-311f4c48c69b/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=2e8f3e6c-3e24-448f-a06f-311f4c48c69b" alt="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" /></a><span class="zem-script more-related pretty-attribution"><script src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" type="text/javascript"></script></span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://raidious.com/earned-media-vs-paid-media-vs-owned-media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

