<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Raidious &#187; Owned media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://raidious.com/tag/owned-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://raidious.com</link>
	<description>Shine Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 22:10:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Social Media Analytics &#8211; AMA Michiana</title>
		<link>http://raidious.com/social-media-analytics-ama-michiana/</link>
		<comments>http://raidious.com/social-media-analytics-ama-michiana/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 20:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Taulbee Jackson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Content Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Content Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Email Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile Device Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Owned Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[measurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Owned media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media Analysis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raidious.com/?p=4040</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Social Media Analytics is an ever-evolving practice. Here is a quick presentation on how Raidious handles analytics on a cross platform basis for socialized media (one point we make here &#8211; social media is a misnomer, it&#8217;s all social). It&#8217;s all about understanding how to grow and engage an audience with content, regardless of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><strong>Social Media Analytics</strong> is an ever-evolving practice. Here is a quick presentation on how Raidious handles analytics on a <a title="Platforms" href="http://raidious.com/disciplines/platforms/" target="_blank">cross platform </a>basis for socialized media (one point we make here &#8211; social media is a misnomer, <a title="Earned Media vs. Paid Media vs. Owned Media" href="http://raidious.com/earned-media-vs-paid-media-vs-owned-media/" target="_blank">it&#8217;s all social</a>). It&#8217;s all about understanding how to grow and engage an audience with content, regardless of the platform &#8211; social or otherwise.</p>
<p>If your company is asking questions like . . . how do we measure the impact of social media? What is the ROI? What metrics should I be paying attention to in which platforms?</p>
<p>We have some answers for you. Please <a title="Let's connect!" href="http://raidious.com/contact/" target="_blank">contact us</a> any time, and we&#8217;ll be happy to have one of our strategists do an analysis of your current efforts.</p>
<div class="prezi-player">
<p><object id="prezi_u1eb69ox2hfp" width="550" height="400" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="flashvars" value="prezi_id=u1eb69ox2hfp&amp;lock_to_path=1&amp;color=ffffff&amp;autoplay=no&amp;autohide_ctrls=0" /><param name="src" value="http://prezi.com/bin/preziloader.swf" /><embed id="prezi_u1eb69ox2hfp" width="550" height="400" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://prezi.com/bin/preziloader.swf" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" flashvars="prezi_id=u1eb69ox2hfp&amp;lock_to_path=1&amp;color=ffffff&amp;autoplay=no&amp;autohide_ctrls=0" /></object></p>
<div class="prezi-player-links">
<p><a title="&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;<br />
&lt;p&gt;                            Social Media Analytics&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;<br />
&lt;p&gt;                  " href="http://prezi.com/u1eb69ox2hfp/ama-michiana/">AMA Michiana</a> on <a href="http://prezi.com">Prezi</a></p>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://raidious.com/social-media-analytics-ama-michiana/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Owned Media: If You Can&#8217;t Say Something Nice, Issue a Press Release</title>
		<link>http://raidious.com/owned-media-if-you-can%e2%80%99t-say-something-nice-issue-a-press-release/</link>
		<comments>http://raidious.com/owned-media-if-you-can%e2%80%99t-say-something-nice-issue-a-press-release/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 17:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Chandler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Owned Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Burson-Marsteller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earned media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gmail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Owned media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paid media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PublicRelations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raidious.com/?p=3867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Engaging a PR firm to propagate negative sentiment via earned media opposes the inherent transparency of owned media.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="post_image_link" href="http://raidious.com/owned-media-if-you-can%e2%80%99t-say-something-nice-issue-a-press-release/" title="Permanent link to Owned Media: If You Can&#8217;t Say Something Nice, Issue a Press Release"><img class="post_image alignright" src="http://raidious.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/low-blow.png" width="300" height="200" alt="Image courtesy Flickr" /></a>
</p><p>Just like everyone&#8217;s mother always said, if you can&#8217;t say something nice, don&#8217;t say anything at all. Or as my grandmother used to say, &#8220;Keep mouthing off like that and a bigger boy&#8217;s going to pop you one.&#8221;</p>
<p>The <a title="owned media" href="http://raidious.com/tag/owned-media/">owned media</a> vs. earned and paid media debate is apparently not immune from the same wisdom passed along by our elders: <a class="zem_slink" title="Google" href="http://google.com" rel="homepage">Google</a> has officially popped <a class="zem_slink" title="Facebook" href="http://facebook.com" rel="homepage">Facebook</a> right in the kisser for saying, well, not-so-nice things.</p>
<p>As has been <a title="CNet" href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13506_3-20062192-17.html?part=rss&amp;subj=news&amp;tag=2547-1_3-0-20" target="_blank">widely</a> <a title="Mashable" href="http://mashable.com/2011/05/12/facebook-smear-campaign-google/" target="_blank">reported</a> <a title="TechCrunch" href="http://techcrunch.com/2011/05/12/facebook-loses-much-face-in-secret-smear-on-google/" target="_blank">all over</a> <a title="GigaOM" href="http://gigaom.com/2011/05/12/facebook-smear-campaign-takes-war-against-google-to-defcon-2/" target="_blank">the web</a>, Facebook was caught red-handed engaging in a smear campaign against Google via public relations company <a class="zem_slink" title="Burson-Marsteller" href="http://www.burson-marsteller.com/" rel="homepage">Burson-Marsteller</a>. After Facebook came clean on Wednesday, the PR firm admitted they had pitched stories to bloggers and other media with statements like &#8220;The American people must be made aware of the now immediate intrusions into their deeply personal lives Google is cataloging and broadcasting every minute of every day&#8211;without their permission.&#8221;</p>
<p>The source of Facebook&#8217;s ire is Google&#8217;s Social Circle, which permits users of Google Chat and Contacts to see public information about each other&#8211;including Facebook information, <a class="zem_slink" title="Twitter" href="http://twitter.com" rel="homepage">Twitter</a> feeds, and personal websites.</p>
<p>To be fair, Google&#8217;s profiling isn&#8217;t exactly opt-in. Whether or not users have a <a class="zem_slink" title="Gmail" href="http://gmail.com" rel="homepage">Gmail</a> or other Google service account, they must sign up for Google Profiles in order to customize and decide exactly what information is available to others.</p>
<p>But compare this to Facebook&#8217;s labyrinthine privacy and security settings, and the frequent complaints about user privacy issues and information sharing, and it seems like the pot calling the kettle black.</p>
<p>Facebook has since stated that it did not intend to engage in a &#8220;smear campagin,&#8221; but was merely trying to ensure the public was well informed. I don&#8217;t recall a public service announcement from Facebook &#8220;informing&#8221; people that they disclose user information to advertisers and other third parties.</p>
<p>Regardless of intent, in my mind it all comes down to the inherent transparency of owned media. Engaging a PR firm to propagate negative sentiment via <a class="zem_slink" title="Earned media" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earned_media" rel="wikipedia">earned media</a> about another company, all the while asking that your company&#8217;s name be withheld, is a smear campaign whether you admit it or not.</p>
<p>Compare that tactic to using owned media channels to go beyond marketing your services to calling into question the business practices of a competitor. How far would you go, knowing that your official platforms were the source of potentially injurious (or worse, libelous) statements? Would you be more or less inclined to bite your tongue?</p>
<p>Not that any of this will ultimately matter to either company: users are more and more free with their personal information on the web, and to most people this is a non-story about two corporate behemoths pointing fingers at each other in the usual game of &#8220;Oh yeah? Well guess what <em>they</em> did!&#8221;</p>
<p>Despite the myriad complaints about privacy, Facebook isn&#8217;t losing users in droves, and people still depend on Google&#8217;s various services like they were oxygen.</p>
<p>White this is far from the first or last such incident, it is nonetheless embarrassing for any company to be outed for throwing such an obvious and ultimately useless low blow. If you&#8217;ve got something to say about a competitor and don&#8217;t have the sand to be completely transparent via owned media, do everyone a favor and heed mom&#8217;s advice.</p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Enhanced by Zemanta" href="http://www.zemanta.com/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/zemified_e.png?x-id=299835d7-f59b-495e-839d-1527f4826122" alt="Enhanced by Zemanta" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://raidious.com/owned-media-if-you-can%e2%80%99t-say-something-nice-issue-a-press-release/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Small Business Canâ€™t Afford to Rely on Facebook</title>
		<link>http://raidious.com/small-business-cant-afford-to-rely-on-facebook/</link>
		<comments>http://raidious.com/small-business-cant-afford-to-rely-on-facebook/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 15:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Chandler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Content Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Owned Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook Platform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Zuckerberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Owned media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web content]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raidious.com/?p=3705</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A well-funded, well-planned Facebook strategy is essential for any business. But to shift the majority of online spending into one silo is suspect.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="post_image_link" href="http://raidious.com/small-business-cant-afford-to-rely-on-facebook/" title="Permanent link to Small Business Canâ€™t Afford to Rely on Facebook"><img class="post_image alignright" src="http://raidious.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/pnl-ZGChPFbDvnk-hd.jpg" width="250" height="377" alt="Image courtesy fotopedia" /></a>
</p><p>Network Solutions recently released its <a title="The State of Small Business? Good, and Getting Better" href="http://www.networksolutions.com/smallbusiness/research-library/?channelid=P99C425S627N0B142A1D38E0000V100" target="_blank">State of Small Business Report</a>, and its findings have sparked conversation about whether <a class="zem_slink" title="Facebook" rel="homepage" href="http://facebook.com">Facebook</a> threatens to replace traditional business websites.</p>
<p>According to the report and an <a title="Will Facebook Replace Traditional Websites?" href="http://myventurepad.com/steveking1/67678/will-facebook-replace-traditional-websites" target="_blank">article in My Venture Pad</a>:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>62% of small businesses said that social media didn&#8217;t change their spending plans for the coming year. 27% said they are planning on increasing their spend due to social media.</em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>But 9% plan on eliminating (4%) or spending less (5%) on their traditional website due to social media. While 9% sounds low, last June only 2% reported plans to spend less or eliminate their traditional website due to social media. </em></p>
<p>From its inception Facebook was intended for individuals, not businesses. Initially the site&#8217;s main founder and CEO <a class="zem_slink" title="Mark Zuckerberg" rel="homepage" href="http://www.facebook.com/markzuckerberg">Mark Zuckerberg</a> was disinclined to even accept advertising despite calls from all sides to find ways to monetize the social networking site. (Just go watch &#8220;<a title="The Social Network" href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1285016/" target="_blank">The Social Network</a>,&#8221; it&#8217;ll save us all some time.)</p>
<p>Now that Facebook has given up any notions of being &#8220;cool&#8221; and is friendlier toward brands, it&#8217;s tempting to dump a massive amount of effort into your company&#8217;s Facebook page. It&#8217;s the number one social networking tool with over half a billion unique monthly users, and its utility as a resource sharing and recruitment tool cannot be denied. But there are troubling questions.</p>
<h2>Where Did My App Go?</h2>
<p>As corporations big and small began to adopt Facebook&#8211;first through Groups and Fan Pages and now simply Pages that users &#8220;like&#8221;&#8211;it seemed as through the company took every step possible to make this process difficult. The standards for what could and could not be done with HTML and Facebook&#8217;s own FBML (<a class="zem_slink" title="Facebook features" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facebook_features">Facebook Markup Language</a>) changed without notice, terminology shifted, and standards and practices were nonexistent.</p>
<p>Now the site has adopted <a class="zem_slink" title="HTML element" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTML_element">iFrames</a>, which allow companies more freedom to display whatever web content they choose within a subset of the overall Facebook experience. What happens when Facebook changes its mind again? Every change in strategy and back-end technology represents a seismic shift in the way businesses interact with the site and its users. As soon as your brand is up and running successfully, you find yourself in the position of rejiggering your content, feeds, and apps, expending time and money repainting the same house over and over.</p>
<h2>Do I Own My Data?</h2>
<p>Facebook has to its credit suffered relatively little downtime throughout its existence. But as with any website, it does happen. When it happens to Facebook, one can hear the screams of withdrawal the world over. As the site has become more popular, it is increasingly the target of scams, phishing attacks, and other efforts to steal user data. If the site&#8217;s databases were to become compromised, a staggering amount of personal user information would be available to scammers, thieves and other criminals.</p>
<p>Just as people once believed that if humans were meant to fly we&#8217;d be born with wings, there is a general sense of finality with Facebook. Where else could we possibly go with social sharing and communication? But ideas do not stop, and when the next big thing comes along Facebook is not immune from suffering a fate similar to MySpace and Friendster&#8211;dropping rapidly and popularity and use. There is no way to say the site will last forever. What happens when Facebook, like other social networking sites before it, starts to look like a ghost town? Where did your investment go?</p>
<h2>The Lesson: Own Your Content</h2>
<p>Your website adheres to your brand at all times, from the visual design down to the domain name. Barring a disaster of <a title="The king of destruction" href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000881/" target="_blank">Michael Baysian</a> proportions, any data and content contained in your site can always be backed up or transferred to any host you like. You and your IT team&#8211;internal or external&#8211;have the ultimate say over anything related to your site.</p>
<p>The same cannot be said of Facebook. You and your brand are at the mercy of their shifting company priorities and policies, changing tastes, and design, not to mention their often-questioned privacy practices.</p>
<p>All of this sounds incredibly negative. I am the first to say that a solid, well-funded, well-planned Facebook strategy is absolutely essential for a business of any size. But to shift the majority of online spending into one silo is suspect. While the transition from a traditional media approach may be difficult to operationalize, it is crucial to maintain a multi-channel presence in which each one supports and augments the other. In short, you need to drive the content on your website to people, utilizing the channels those users like best.</p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Enhanced by Zemanta" href="http://www.zemanta.com/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/zemified_e.png?x-id=1a52b80c-bc75-4023-8b08-45f7494fff5e" alt="Enhanced by Zemanta" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://raidious.com/small-business-cant-afford-to-rely-on-facebook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Raidious Social Media Tip of the Week</title>
		<link>http://raidious.com/raidious-social-media-tip-of-the-week/</link>
		<comments>http://raidious.com/raidious-social-media-tip-of-the-week/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 21:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Smith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Content Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Owned Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Content Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Owned media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raidious.com/?p=3641</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every now and then Raidious will offer little tips and advice that will help make a powerful impact on your social media campaign.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="post_image_link" href="http://raidious.com/raidious-social-media-tip-of-the-week/" title="Permanent link to Raidious Social Media Tip of the Week"><img class="post_image alignright" src="http://raidious.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/voice.png" width="250" height="276" alt="Image courtesy Wikimedia Commons" /></a>
</p><p>Every  now and then <a title="Raidious" href="http://raidious.com">Raidious</a> will offer little tips and advice that will help make a  powerful impact on your social <a class="zem_slink" title="Mass media" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_media">media campaign</a>. Today&#8217;s social media tip is centered  around your brand&#8217;s voice.</p>
<p>&#8220;Voice&#8221;  is the key word here. Before you go jumping on <a class="zem_slink" title="Twitter" rel="homepage" href="http://twitter.com">Twitter</a> and <a class="zem_slink" title="Facebook" rel="homepage" href="http://facebook.com">Facebook</a>,  posting content left and right, you need to consider exactly how you  want your brand to sound to your audience. This is key to being  able to create real and valuable engagements with your customers.</p>
<p>Remember  when you&#8217;re creating content for your pages that you are speaking for  the brand, and not yourself. Once you&#8217;ve got that down, your followers  will be more interested in interacting with the brand they know and  appreciate.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.getsocialcenter.com">Social Center</a></p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Enhanced by Zemanta" href="http://www.zemanta.com/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/zemified_e.png?x-id=bce2a914-c9c9-49ef-9873-19d86d65a962" alt="Enhanced by Zemanta" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://raidious.com/raidious-social-media-tip-of-the-week/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Raidiousâ€™ Three Pillars of Social Media</title>
		<link>http://raidious.com/raidious%e2%80%99-three-pillars-of-social-media/</link>
		<comments>http://raidious.com/raidious%e2%80%99-three-pillars-of-social-media/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 20:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Smith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Content Planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Content Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Content Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Owned Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[measurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Owned media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strategy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://raidious.com/?p=3617</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Raidious broke social media into three main categories that describe exactly what you need to be doing for a successful social media campaign.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="post_image_link" href="http://raidious.com/raidious%e2%80%99-three-pillars-of-social-media/" title="Permanent link to Raidiousâ€™ Three Pillars of Social Media"><img class="post_image aligncenter" src="http://raidious.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/analytics.png" width="600" height="157" alt="Social Center" /></a>
</p><p>There are many different perspectives on <a class="zem_slink" title="Social media" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_media">social media</a> marketing. Everyone has a unique  strategy, or theory when it comes to communicating your <a class="zem_slink" title="Brand" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brand">brand</a> message  online. We at <a href="http://www.raidious.com">Raidious</a> are no different.</p>
<p>Raidious broke social media into three main categories that describe exactly what you need to be doing for a successful social media campaign.</p>
<h2>#1. Content</h2>
<p>At  Raidious we believe that content is king regardless of the platform.  Content is anything you post on your pages in order to interact with  your customers. This could be a <a class="zem_slink" title="Facebook" rel="homepage" href="http://facebook.com">Facebook</a> post, a tweet, photo, video,  link, etc.</p>
<p>Developing  the <a class="zem_slink" title="Content strategy" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Content_strategy">content strategy</a> that works best for your brand takes time, and it  requires plenty of listening. In order to know what your followers want  you to talk about, you must first listen to them. Create content, and  then track it using tools like <a href="http://getsocialcenter.com">Social Center</a>. If no one is interacting  with your content then try something else.</p>
<h2>#2. Monitoring</h2>
<p>Monitoring  means listening. Put simply as possible, it&#8217;s listening to the internet. Create search terms and monitor them for mentions of your  brand. This includes blogs, social, forums, news sites, etc. Any time  your brand is mentioned on the internet, you should know about it.This  is how you find out what is being said about your brand, whether  positive or negative, in order to know how to manage your online  presence.</p>
<h2>#3. Moderation</h2>
<p>Moderating  could also be called Monitoring Plus. The whole point of social media is  the ability to interact with your constituents. You create a piece of  content with the goal of getting your followers to comment, like,  retweet, and reply. Your ability to continue the conversation is key,  so post responses to comments and thank your supporters for retweeting  and being great advocates for your brand.</p>
<p>If  you&#8217;re only doing one of these processes for your brand, then your social campaign needs some tweaking. Remember, social media is social.  Engage in the conversation to create advocates.</p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Enhanced by Zemanta" href="http://www.zemanta.com/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/zemified_e.png?x-id=9f0f2186-b091-4ece-bd5e-4cbb7e8beae9" alt="Enhanced by Zemanta" /></a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://raidious.com/raidious%e2%80%99-three-pillars-of-social-media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Owned Media update: Official Research from Forrester</title>
		<link>http://raidious.com/owned-media-update-official-research-from-forrester/</link>
		<comments>http://raidious.com/owned-media-update-official-research-from-forrester/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 18:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Taulbee Jackson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Content Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earned media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forrester Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing and Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Owned media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paid media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PR firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public relations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.raidious.com/?p=1035</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back in September, I wrote this post regarding the definitions of Paid Media (what Ad Agencies do), Earned Media(what PR firms do) and Owned Media (what Raidious does).

Recently found this article from Forrester Research, apparently they've been looking into this. Good information!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Back in September, I wrote <a title="owned media paid media earned media" href="http://blog.raidious.com/earned-media-vs-paid-media-vs-owned-media/" target="_self">this post</a> regarding the definitions of <a id="aptureLink_fVegC3kW1Z" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advertising">Paid Media</a> (what Ad Agencies do), <a id="aptureLink_5yRfXnRgh9" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earned%20media">Earned Media</a>(what PR firms do) and <a id="aptureLink_3dRlzycE7s" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sIFYPQjYhv8">Owned Media</a> (what Raidious does).</p>
<p>Recently found <a title="Forrester on Owned Media" href="http://blogs.forrester.com/marketing/2009/12/defining-earned-owned-and-paid-media.html" target="_blank">this article</a> from <a id="aptureLink_haZ3FeUpSW" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forrester%20Research">Forrester Research</a>, apparently they&#8217;ve been looking into this. Good information!</p>
<div id="attachment_1037" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 600px">
	<a href="http://blog.raidious.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/OwnedMedia.gif"><img class="size-full wp-image-1037" title="OwnedMedia" src="http://blog.raidious.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/OwnedMedia.gif" alt="Owned Media vs Paid Media vs Earned Media" width="600" height="327" /></a>
	<p class="wp-caption-text">Raidious is purpose built to manage owned media properties for large brands. </p>
</div>
<p><strong>Related articles by Zemanta</strong></p>
<ul class="zemanta-article-ul">
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.socialmediatoday.com/SMC/162110">The 2010 Social Media Marketing Ecosystem</a> (socialmediatoday.com)</li>
</ul>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/276ac88e-9ab9-4862-ba95-56a95e61638d/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=276ac88e-9ab9-4862-ba95-56a95e61638d" alt="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" /></a><span class="zem-script more-related pretty-attribution"><script src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" type="text/javascript"></script></span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://raidious.com/owned-media-update-official-research-from-forrester/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Earned Media vs. Paid Media vs. Owned Media</title>
		<link>http://raidious.com/earned-media-vs-paid-media-vs-owned-media/</link>
		<comments>http://raidious.com/earned-media-vs-paid-media-vs-owned-media/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Taulbee Jackson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Content Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Email Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earned media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing and Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Owned media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paid media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video clip]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.raidious.com/earned-media-vs-paid-media-vs-owned-media/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the past, there were basically two approaches to marketing services: earned media (PR) and paid media (advertising). More recently we've seen the rise of owned media.

What's the difference? It's mostly about Control.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>In the past, there were basically two approaches to <a class="zem_slink" title="Marketing" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marketing">marketing</a> services: earned media (PR) and paid media (<a class="zem_slink" title="Advertising" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advertising">advertising</a>). More recently we&#8217;ve seen the rise of owned media.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s the difference? It&#8217;s mostly about Control.</p>
<p><span id="more-674"></span></p>
<p>Earned media: Getting someone else to provide content about you on a media platform they own and control. Also known as <a class="zem_slink" title="Public relations" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_relations">Public Relations</a>.</p>
<p>Paid Media: Paying someone to include your message alongside their content, on media they own and control. Also known as Advertising.</p>
<p>Owned Media: Providing your own content on media platforms you own and control.</p>
<p>Raidious deals only with owned media &#8211; we help you provide the content for the media platforms you own and control &#8211; email, <a class="zem_slink" title="Blog" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blog">blogs</a>, social media, <a class="zem_slink" title="Video clip" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Video_clip">web video</a>, <a class="zem_slink" title="Mobile device" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobile_device">mobile devices</a>, and more.</p>
<blockquote><p>UPDATE: Recently found <a title="Forrester on Owned Media" href="http://blogs.forrester.com/marketing/2009/12/defining-earned-owned-and-paid-media.html" target="_blank">this article</a> from <a id="aptureLink_haZ3FeUpSW" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forrester%20Research">Forrester Research</a>, apparently they&#8217;ve been looking into this. Good information.</p></blockquote>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/2e8f3e6c-3e24-448f-a06f-311f4c48c69b/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=2e8f3e6c-3e24-448f-a06f-311f4c48c69b" alt="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" /></a><span class="zem-script more-related pretty-attribution"><script src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" type="text/javascript"></script></span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://raidious.com/earned-media-vs-paid-media-vs-owned-media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

