<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who Owns Your Social Media Content? Does It Matter?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://raidious.com/who-owns-your-social-media-content-does-it-matter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://raidious.com/who-owns-your-social-media-content-does-it-matter/</link>
	<description>Shine Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 02:23:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: chandler</title>
		<link>http://raidious.com/who-owns-your-social-media-content-does-it-matter/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>chandler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 01:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.raidious.com/?p=823#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Thanks for bringing this post (and Raidious) into the discussion  in your organization.

We&#039;d obviously be happy to speak with you all if you&#039;re so inclined.

Matt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for bringing this post (and Raidious) into the discussion  in your organization.</p>
<p>We&#8217;d obviously be happy to speak with you all if you&#8217;re so inclined.</p>
<p>Matt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mamaleh</title>
		<link>http://raidious.com/who-owns-your-social-media-content-does-it-matter/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>mamaleh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 01:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.raidious.com/?p=823#comment-9</guid>
		<description>fascinating stuff! I actually ended up discussing and applying several of the concepts enumerated whilst talking about conceptual ownership issues in new media art...in the post-Pop art landscape, there are still massive grey areas surrounding intellectual property, fair use, copyrighting and proprietary concepts and techniques. it&#039;s amazing how deceptively simple something like a warhol print of a men&#039;s clothing ad can be, and how quickly the simplicity is bogged down by issues of brand ownership, intellectual property and conceptual value: whew! ditto jenny holzer&#039;s use of the times sq. spectacolor marquees and joey skaggs&#039; use of talk and newsmagazine shows as artistic media...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fascinating stuff! I actually ended up discussing and applying several of the concepts enumerated whilst talking about conceptual ownership issues in new media art&#8230;in the post-Pop art landscape, there are still massive grey areas surrounding intellectual property, fair use, copyrighting and proprietary concepts and techniques. it&#8217;s amazing how deceptively simple something like a warhol print of a men&#8217;s clothing ad can be, and how quickly the simplicity is bogged down by issues of brand ownership, intellectual property and conceptual value: whew! ditto jenny holzer&#8217;s use of the times sq. spectacolor marquees and joey skaggs&#8217; use of talk and newsmagazine shows as artistic media&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

